The indicator lab · candidate instruments
88 candidate instruments, read across market structure, liquidity, fundamentals, supply, derivatives, macro, and attention. The point is not the count. The point is that we test them, reject the noisy ones, and only promote the few that earn it. Nothing here is labelled proven, and we publish no hit-rate we have not earned.
We can show a current reading now, from a keyless open feed.
Computable soon: it needs one more keyless fetch or light wiring.
Calendar or novelty context, charming but not a signal until a backtest proves it.
Would need paid or on-chain data we honestly do not have.
What this page answers
Each instrument carries a status, not a score. Live can be read now from open data, candidate needs one more fetch, folklore is calendar context, and insufficient would need data we do not have. An instrument is only promoted to the Deep 11 scoring once it survives out-of-sample testing. Until then it sits on the bench, honestly labelled.
A live status means we can read the number today. It does not mean the indicator predicts anything. Predictive claims need out-of-sample correlation, walk-forward testing, false-discovery control (so 88 instruments across many assets do not produce false winners by chance), minimum data coverage, and a drawdown sanity check. We have not run that yet, so we make no predictive claim. The catalogue is the honest first step; the validation is the next one.
Information, not financial advice. Every reading describes the water, it does not tell anyone to jump in.