Taking the sounding

sounding open dataReading the waterlineLive sources are loading. Nothing is filled with placeholder market data.

Live validated snapshot

Chain liquidity sounding

Redstone

The current depth is measured, but the seven-day direction is withheld until the elapsed-time window reconciles.

Reported nominal TVL$0.0000Seven-day direction withheld

Depth rank: #453
Protocols mapped: 1

Source: DeFiLlama open chain roster
Captured: 2026-08-11T06:48:34.599Z
Unit: Nominal USD TVL
Does not prove: Deposits, exits, or unique users

What this page answers

Redstone reports $0.0000 in nominal DeFi TVL. The roster maps 1 protocols to this chain. It ranks #453 by Bathymark depth. No seven-day TVL change is assigned because the history does not reconcile to the requested elapsed-time window.

Chain TVL change context What TVL means Data source and limits

depth over timepeak $43.3K

Depth rank: #453
Protocols read: 1

State: Direction withheld
Confidence: lowThe chain level is source-backed. Confidence is capped because token-price effects are not removed from TVL.
Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC

Three strongest drivers

Reported nominal TVL$0.0000Current chain level from the validated DeFiLlama chain roster.
Seven-day nominal changeWithheldThe validated history has 562 daily observations, but it does not reconcile to the requested seven-day window.
Protocol roster1 protocolsThe roster identifies presence, not each protocol's allocation to this chain.

Open the 30-second readChange, history, comparison, and implication

What changed

A seven-day change is withheld until the history has two endpoints in the requested window.

The validated history has 562 daily observations, but it does not reconcile to the requested seven-day window.

Is it unusual

Current nominal TVL sits at the 14th percentile of the stored chain history.

Daily nominal-TVL change volatility is 5.23%. Price effects remain inside that history.

How it compares

Redstone ranks #453 of 461 validated chains by nominal USD TVL.

The validated chain median is $338.1K. This is a level comparison, not a quality verdict.

Why it matters

The current level is visible, but the direction thesis is not ready.

This is market-structure context, not a forecast or a trade recommendation.

Open the evidence trailCounterevidence, invalidation, sources, and method

What argues against this reading

Token-price repricing can explain some or all of the nominal USD TVL change.

Bathymark does not label this series fresh capital, deposits, or withdrawals.

The stablecoin cash layer did not return a validated chain value.

SakuraSwap CLMM leads the visible protocol roster, but the slim endpoint does not expose its exact Redstone allocation.

What would change the call

The direction call becomes available when two reconciled endpoints span seven days.

Measured byFirst and last validated DeFiLlama chain TVL values across a seven-day window under the same method version.

Next review

Next daily chain-depth review

Exact sources

DeFiLlama Historical Chain TVL APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/historicalChainTvl/RedstoneSource observation: 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCSupports: Nominal USD chain TVL history and reconciled period changes.Limit: The chain TVL history passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Chains APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/chainsSupports: Current nominal chain TVL and peer ranking.Limit: The chain roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Protocols APIhttps://api.llama.fi/protocolsSupports: Protocol presence, category, and total global TVL for the chain roster.Limit: Protocol TVL is a source-reported nominal USD value, not executable token liquidity or proof of custody, solvency, safety, or redeemability.
DeFiLlama Stablecoin Chains APIhttps://stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoinchainsSupports: Open-data circulating USD market value across all reported stablecoin peg buckets on each chain.Limit: The per-chain stablecoin roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.

Formula

7d nominal TVL change = (last nominal USD TVL - first nominal USD TVL) / first nominal USD TVL * 100

The displayed period change is accepted only when it reconciles with the first and last source values. Price effects are not removed.

Open formula note

Snapshot receipt

Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC
Ingested: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC
Method version: chain-depth-2026-07-11.1Current level, historical context, peer rank, and corroborating evidence remain separate fields.

Missing inputs

Price-adjusted deposits and withdrawals
Validated stablecoin circulating USD market value on this chain

Protocol roster map

Categories among protocols that list Redstone. This uses each protocol's total global TVL as roster weight because the slim open list does not expose per-chain protocol allocation. CEX reserve rows are omitted from this chain roster.

Dexs1 row

This chain, measured

The Almanac's instruments, read for Redstone alone. Open any one for the full method, history, and what it can and cannot mean.

Share of all DeFi

0.00%rank #453 of 461

Redstone holds 0.00% of all on-chain liquidity, the #453 deepest chain. Dominance is how much of the ocean sits here.

30-day tide

Range: Redstone TVLMar 24, 2026 to May 22, 2026
Observations: 60
First: $27,758
Latest: $27,590

-7.4%draining

Redstone's reported USD TVL moved -7.4% over the last month. Token-price effects are not removed, so this is not labelled deposit flow.

Roster concentration

100%SakuraSwap CLMM leads roster

SakuraSwap CLMM is 100% of the listed non-CEX roster by global protocol TVL. This is context, not a per-chain allocation.

Largest protocols by reported TVL on Redstone

Protocols that list Redstone, ranked by each protocol's total reported total TVL. The open list does not expose chain-specific allocation for every protocol, so this is a non-CEX roster read, not a per-chain TVL split.

Protocol	Category	TVL	7d
SakuraSwap CLMM	Dexs	$1.73M	+1.5%

Bathymark reads this chain from DeFiLlama's open chain and protocol datasets. TVL can rise or fall because asset prices moved, so the branded tide is a nominal USD depth-proxy reading, not measured flow or a forecast.

How to read Redstone liquidity

Protocol concentration

Bathymark reads 1 large protocols and 1 categories on Redstone. Concentration matters because one venue can make a chain look deeper than it is, even when the venue also operates elsewhere.

What it cannot mean

Rising TVL cannot prove new users arrived. Falling TVL cannot prove abandonment. The number describes depth, then the cause has to be checked.

Questions this page answers

What is Redstone TVL in this snapshot?

Redstone reports $0.0000 in nominal DeFi TVL on Bathymark's current open-data reading. That is a USD-valued depth proxy, not measured exit liquidity.

Is Redstone nominal TVL rising or falling?

Bathymark cannot reconcile two Redstone history endpoints to the requested seven-day window, so no liquidity direction is assigned.

Which protocols hold the most liquidity on Redstone?

SakuraSwap CLMM are among the deepest protocols Bathymark reads on Redstone.

What does liquidity depth mean for Redstone?

Bathymark uses reported USD TVL as an open depth proxy for the ecosystem. It is not an order-book or exit-liquidity measure, and it can move because deposits, withdrawals, token prices, incentives, or source mapping changed.

Measurement receipt

What this number is, and is not

Bathymark reads source-reported USD TVL as a chain-depth proxy. The value can move because assets repriced, deposits changed, withdrawals changed, incentives moved, or the source mapping changed.

Source: DeFiLlama chain, protocol, and stablecoin datasets
Snapshot: 2026-08-11T06:48:34.599Z
Freshness: Live validated snapshot
History: Current validated history captured 2026-08-11T06:48:35.137Z
Caveat: Nominal USD change, price effects are not removed

Read the method Inspect source policy

Connected to Redstone

Every surface that reads this chain from another angle, so a question that starts here never dead-ends.

Taking the sounding

Live validated snapshot

Chain liquidity sounding

Redstone

The current depth is measured, but the seven-day direction is withheld until the elapsed-time window reconciles.

Reported nominal TVL$0.0000Seven-day direction withheld

Depth rank: #453
Protocols mapped: 1

Source: DeFiLlama open chain roster
Captured: 2026-08-11T06:48:34.599Z
Unit: Nominal USD TVL
Does not prove: Deposits, exits, or unique users

What this page answers

Chain TVL change context What TVL means Data source and limits

depth over timepeak $43.3K

Depth rank: #453
Protocols read: 1

State: Direction withheld
Confidence: lowThe chain level is source-backed. Confidence is capped because token-price effects are not removed from TVL.
Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC

Three strongest drivers

Reported nominal TVL$0.0000Current chain level from the validated DeFiLlama chain roster.
Seven-day nominal changeWithheldThe validated history has 562 daily observations, but it does not reconcile to the requested seven-day window.
Protocol roster1 protocolsThe roster identifies presence, not each protocol's allocation to this chain.

Open the 30-second readChange, history, comparison, and implication

What changed

A seven-day change is withheld until the history has two endpoints in the requested window.

The validated history has 562 daily observations, but it does not reconcile to the requested seven-day window.

Is it unusual

Current nominal TVL sits at the 14th percentile of the stored chain history.

Daily nominal-TVL change volatility is 5.23%. Price effects remain inside that history.

How it compares

Redstone ranks #453 of 461 validated chains by nominal USD TVL.

The validated chain median is $338.1K. This is a level comparison, not a quality verdict.

Why it matters

The current level is visible, but the direction thesis is not ready.

This is market-structure context, not a forecast or a trade recommendation.

Open the evidence trailCounterevidence, invalidation, sources, and method

What argues against this reading

Token-price repricing can explain some or all of the nominal USD TVL change.

Bathymark does not label this series fresh capital, deposits, or withdrawals.

The stablecoin cash layer did not return a validated chain value.

SakuraSwap CLMM leads the visible protocol roster, but the slim endpoint does not expose its exact Redstone allocation.

What would change the call

The direction call becomes available when two reconciled endpoints span seven days.

Measured byFirst and last validated DeFiLlama chain TVL values across a seven-day window under the same method version.

Next review

Next daily chain-depth review

Exact sources

DeFiLlama Historical Chain TVL APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/historicalChainTvl/RedstoneSource observation: 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCSupports: Nominal USD chain TVL history and reconciled period changes.Limit: The chain TVL history passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Chains APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/chainsSupports: Current nominal chain TVL and peer ranking.Limit: The chain roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Protocols APIhttps://api.llama.fi/protocolsSupports: Protocol presence, category, and total global TVL for the chain roster.Limit: Protocol TVL is a source-reported nominal USD value, not executable token liquidity or proof of custody, solvency, safety, or redeemability.
DeFiLlama Stablecoin Chains APIhttps://stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoinchainsSupports: Open-data circulating USD market value across all reported stablecoin peg buckets on each chain.Limit: The per-chain stablecoin roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.

Formula

7d nominal TVL change = (last nominal USD TVL - first nominal USD TVL) / first nominal USD TVL * 100

The displayed period change is accepted only when it reconciles with the first and last source values. Price effects are not removed.

Open formula note

Snapshot receipt

Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC
Ingested: 2026-08-11 06:48 UTC
Method version: chain-depth-2026-07-11.1Current level, historical context, peer rank, and corroborating evidence remain separate fields.

Missing inputs

Price-adjusted deposits and withdrawals
Validated stablecoin circulating USD market value on this chain

Protocol roster map

Dexs1 row

This chain, measured

The Almanac's instruments, read for Redstone alone. Open any one for the full method, history, and what it can and cannot mean.

Share of all DeFi

0.00%rank #453 of 461

Redstone holds 0.00% of all on-chain liquidity, the #453 deepest chain. Dominance is how much of the ocean sits here.

30-day tide

Range: Redstone TVLMar 24, 2026 to May 22, 2026
Observations: 60
First: $27,758
Latest: $27,590

-7.4%draining

Redstone's reported USD TVL moved -7.4% over the last month. Token-price effects are not removed, so this is not labelled deposit flow.

Roster concentration

100%SakuraSwap CLMM leads roster

SakuraSwap CLMM is 100% of the listed non-CEX roster by global protocol TVL. This is context, not a per-chain allocation.

Largest protocols by reported TVL on Redstone

Protocol	Category	TVL	7d
SakuraSwap CLMM	Dexs	$1.73M	+1.5%

How to read Redstone liquidity

Protocol concentration

Bathymark reads 1 large protocols and 1 categories on Redstone. Concentration matters because one venue can make a chain look deeper than it is, even when the venue also operates elsewhere.

What it cannot mean

Rising TVL cannot prove new users arrived. Falling TVL cannot prove abandonment. The number describes depth, then the cause has to be checked.

Questions this page answers

What is Redstone TVL in this snapshot?

Redstone reports $0.0000 in nominal DeFi TVL on Bathymark's current open-data reading. That is a USD-valued depth proxy, not measured exit liquidity.

Is Redstone nominal TVL rising or falling?

Bathymark cannot reconcile two Redstone history endpoints to the requested seven-day window, so no liquidity direction is assigned.

Which protocols hold the most liquidity on Redstone?

SakuraSwap CLMM are among the deepest protocols Bathymark reads on Redstone.

What does liquidity depth mean for Redstone?

Measurement receipt

What this number is, and is not

Bathymark reads source-reported USD TVL as a chain-depth proxy. The value can move because assets repriced, deposits changed, withdrawals changed, incentives moved, or the source mapping changed.

Source: DeFiLlama chain, protocol, and stablecoin datasets
Snapshot: 2026-08-11T06:48:34.599Z
Freshness: Live validated snapshot
History: Current validated history captured 2026-08-11T06:48:35.137Z
Caveat: Nominal USD change, price effects are not removed

Read the method Inspect source policy

Connected to Redstone

Every surface that reads this chain from another angle, so a question that starts here never dead-ends.