Taking the sounding

sounding open dataReading the waterlineLive sources are loading. Nothing is filled with placeholder market data.

Live validated snapshot

Chain liquidity sounding

Zero Network

Zero Network nominal depth is draining across the latest 7.3 observed days. Token-price effects remain in the TVL reading.

Reported nominal TVL$1.5K-96.3% across 7.3 observed days

Depth rank: #327
Protocols mapped: 2

Source: DeFiLlama open chain roster
Captured: 2026-08-11T06:47:29.918Z
Unit: Nominal USD TVL
Does not prove: Deposits, exits, or unique users

What this page answers

Zero Network reports $1.5K in nominal DeFi TVL. The roster maps 2 protocols to this chain. It ranks #327 by Bathymark depth. Its weekly nominal TVL change is -96.3% across 7.3 observed days, and its 30-day change is -96.2% across 30.3 observed days. Token-price effects are not removed.

Chain TVL change context What TVL means Data source and limits

depth over timepeak $1.17M

Depth rank: #327
Protocols read: 2

State: Reported depth is draining
Confidence: moderateThe chain level is source-backed. Confidence is capped because token-price effects are not removed from TVL.
Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC

Three strongest drivers

Reported nominal TVL$1.5KCurrent chain level from the validated DeFiLlama chain roster.
Seven-day nominal change-96.3%$40.3K to $1.5K across 7 observed days.
Protocol roster2 protocolsThe roster identifies presence, not each protocol's allocation to this chain.

Open the 30-second readChange, history, comparison, and implication

What changed

Reported nominal USD TVL changed by -$38.8K over seven days.

$40.3K to $1.5K across 7 observed days. The reconciled 30-day change is -96.2%.

Is it unusual

Current nominal TVL sits at the 0th percentile of the stored chain history.

Daily nominal-TVL change volatility is 110.53%. Price effects remain inside that history.

How it compares

Zero Network ranks #327 of 461 validated chains by nominal USD TVL.

The validated chain median is $338.1K. This is a level comparison, not a quality verdict.

Why it matters

Reported depth is weakening, so the chain has less visible USD-denominated capacity than one week earlier.

This is market-structure context, not a forecast or a trade recommendation.

Open the evidence trailCounterevidence, invalidation, sources, and method

What argues against this reading

Token-price repricing can explain some or all of the nominal USD TVL change.

Bathymark does not label this series fresh capital, deposits, or withdrawals.

The stablecoin cash layer did not return a validated chain value.

SakuraSwap AMM leads the visible protocol roster, but the slim endpoint does not expose its exact Zero Network allocation.

What would change the call

The draining call changes if the reconciled seven-day nominal USD TVL change is 0% or higher.

Measured byFirst and last validated DeFiLlama chain TVL values across a seven-day window under the same method version.

Next review

Next daily chain-depth review

Exact sources

DeFiLlama Historical Chain TVL APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/historicalChainTvl/Zero%20NetworkSource observation: 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCSupports: Nominal USD chain TVL history and reconciled period changes.Limit: The chain TVL history passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Chains APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/chainsSupports: Current nominal chain TVL and peer ranking.Limit: The chain roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Protocols APIhttps://api.llama.fi/protocolsSupports: Protocol presence, category, and total global TVL for the chain roster.Limit: Protocol TVL is a source-reported nominal USD value, not executable token liquidity or proof of custody, solvency, safety, or redeemability.
DeFiLlama Stablecoin Chains APIhttps://stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoinchainsSupports: Open-data circulating USD market value across all reported stablecoin peg buckets on each chain.Limit: The per-chain stablecoin roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.

Formula

7d nominal TVL change = (last nominal USD TVL - first nominal USD TVL) / first nominal USD TVL * 100

The displayed period change is accepted only when it reconciles with the first and last source values. Price effects are not removed.

Open formula note

Snapshot receipt

Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC
Ingested: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC
Method version: chain-depth-2026-07-11.1Current level, historical context, peer rank, and corroborating evidence remain separate fields.

Missing inputs

Price-adjusted deposits and withdrawals
Validated stablecoin circulating USD market value on this chain

Protocol roster map

Categories among protocols that list Zero Network. This uses each protocol's total global TVL as roster weight because the slim open list does not expose per-chain protocol allocation. CEX reserve rows are omitted from this chain roster.

Dexs2 rows

The largest listed protocol's global TVL is 136683.0% of this chain's TVL, so treat the roster as context, not allocation.

This chain, measured

The Almanac's instruments, read for Zero Network alone. Open any one for the full method, history, and what it can and cannot mean.

Share of all DeFi

0.00%rank #327 of 461

Zero Network holds 0.00% of all on-chain liquidity, the #327 deepest chain. Dominance is how much of the ocean sits here.

30-day tide

Range: Zero Network TVLJun 13, 2026 to Aug 11, 2026
Observations: 60
First: $126,153
Latest: $1,480

-96.2%draining

Zero Network's reported USD TVL moved -96.2% over the last month. Token-price effects are not removed, so this is not labelled deposit flow.

Roster concentration

54%SakuraSwap AMM leads roster

SakuraSwap AMM is 54% of the listed non-CEX roster by global protocol TVL. This is context, not a per-chain allocation.

Largest protocols by reported TVL on Zero Network

Protocols that list Zero Network, ranked by each protocol's total reported total TVL. The open list does not expose chain-specific allocation for every protocol, so this is a non-CEX roster read, not a per-chain TVL split.

Protocol	Category	TVL	7d
SakuraSwap AMM	Dexs	$2.02M	-3.1%
SakuraSwap CLMM	Dexs	$1.73M	+1.5%

Bathymark reads this chain from DeFiLlama's open chain and protocol datasets. TVL can rise or fall because asset prices moved, so the branded tide is a nominal USD depth-proxy reading, not measured flow or a forecast.

How to read Zero Network liquidity

7-day and 30-day nominal TVL tide

The short tide is -96.3% across 7.3 observed days. The 30-day tide is -96.2% across 30.3 observed days. Read those as nominal USD movement in the depth proxy. Token-price effects are not removed.

Protocol concentration

Bathymark reads 2 large protocols and 1 categories on Zero Network. Concentration matters because one venue can make a chain look deeper than it is, even when the venue also operates elsewhere.

What it cannot mean

Rising TVL cannot prove new users arrived. Falling TVL cannot prove abandonment. The number describes depth, then the cause has to be checked.

Questions this page answers

What is Zero Network TVL in this snapshot?

Zero Network reports $1.5K in nominal DeFi TVL on Bathymark's current open-data reading. That is a USD-valued depth proxy, not measured exit liquidity.

Is Zero Network nominal TVL rising or falling?

Zero Network is draining in the weekly window, with a nominal TVL tide of -96.3% across 7.3 observed days and a 30-day nominal tide of -96.2% across 30.3 observed days. Token-price effects are not removed.

Which protocols hold the most liquidity on Zero Network?

SakuraSwap AMM, SakuraSwap CLMM are among the deepest protocols Bathymark reads on Zero Network.

What does liquidity depth mean for Zero Network?

Bathymark uses reported USD TVL as an open depth proxy for the ecosystem. It is not an order-book or exit-liquidity measure, and it can move because deposits, withdrawals, token prices, incentives, or source mapping changed.

Measurement receipt

What this number is, and is not

Bathymark reads source-reported USD TVL as a chain-depth proxy. The value can move because assets repriced, deposits changed, withdrawals changed, incentives moved, or the source mapping changed.

Source: DeFiLlama chain, protocol, and stablecoin datasets
Snapshot: 2026-08-11T06:47:29.918Z
Freshness: Live validated snapshot
History: Current validated history captured 2026-08-11T06:47:52.007Z
Caveat: Nominal USD change, price effects are not removed

Read the method Inspect source policy

Connected to Zero Network

Every surface that reads this chain from another angle, so a question that starts here never dead-ends.

Taking the sounding

Live validated snapshot

Chain liquidity sounding

Zero Network

Zero Network nominal depth is draining across the latest 7.3 observed days. Token-price effects remain in the TVL reading.

Reported nominal TVL$1.5K-96.3% across 7.3 observed days

Depth rank: #327
Protocols mapped: 2

Source: DeFiLlama open chain roster
Captured: 2026-08-11T06:47:29.918Z
Unit: Nominal USD TVL
Does not prove: Deposits, exits, or unique users

What this page answers

Chain TVL change context What TVL means Data source and limits

depth over timepeak $1.17M

Depth rank: #327
Protocols read: 2

State: Reported depth is draining
Confidence: moderateThe chain level is source-backed. Confidence is capped because token-price effects are not removed from TVL.
Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC

Three strongest drivers

Reported nominal TVL$1.5KCurrent chain level from the validated DeFiLlama chain roster.
Seven-day nominal change-96.3%$40.3K to $1.5K across 7 observed days.
Protocol roster2 protocolsThe roster identifies presence, not each protocol's allocation to this chain.

Open the 30-second readChange, history, comparison, and implication

What changed

Reported nominal USD TVL changed by -$38.8K over seven days.

$40.3K to $1.5K across 7 observed days. The reconciled 30-day change is -96.2%.

Is it unusual

Current nominal TVL sits at the 0th percentile of the stored chain history.

Daily nominal-TVL change volatility is 110.53%. Price effects remain inside that history.

How it compares

Zero Network ranks #327 of 461 validated chains by nominal USD TVL.

The validated chain median is $338.1K. This is a level comparison, not a quality verdict.

Why it matters

Reported depth is weakening, so the chain has less visible USD-denominated capacity than one week earlier.

This is market-structure context, not a forecast or a trade recommendation.

Open the evidence trailCounterevidence, invalidation, sources, and method

What argues against this reading

Token-price repricing can explain some or all of the nominal USD TVL change.

Bathymark does not label this series fresh capital, deposits, or withdrawals.

The stablecoin cash layer did not return a validated chain value.

SakuraSwap AMM leads the visible protocol roster, but the slim endpoint does not expose its exact Zero Network allocation.

What would change the call

The draining call changes if the reconciled seven-day nominal USD TVL change is 0% or higher.

Measured byFirst and last validated DeFiLlama chain TVL values across a seven-day window under the same method version.

Next review

Next daily chain-depth review

Exact sources

DeFiLlama Historical Chain TVL APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/historicalChainTvl/Zero%20NetworkSource observation: 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCSupports: Nominal USD chain TVL history and reconciled period changes.Limit: The chain TVL history passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Chains APIhttps://api.llama.fi/v2/chainsSupports: Current nominal chain TVL and peer ranking.Limit: The chain roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.
DeFiLlama Protocols APIhttps://api.llama.fi/protocolsSupports: Protocol presence, category, and total global TVL for the chain roster.Limit: Protocol TVL is a source-reported nominal USD value, not executable token liquidity or proof of custody, solvency, safety, or redeemability.
DeFiLlama Stablecoin Chains APIhttps://stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoinchainsSupports: Open-data circulating USD market value across all reported stablecoin peg buckets on each chain.Limit: The per-chain stablecoin roster passed schema, completeness, and freshness checks.

Formula

7d nominal TVL change = (last nominal USD TVL - first nominal USD TVL) / first nominal USD TVL * 100

The displayed period change is accepted only when it reconciles with the first and last source values. Price effects are not removed.

Open formula note

Snapshot receipt

Snapshot captured: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC
Ingested: 2026-08-11 06:47 UTC
Method version: chain-depth-2026-07-11.1Current level, historical context, peer rank, and corroborating evidence remain separate fields.

Missing inputs

Price-adjusted deposits and withdrawals
Validated stablecoin circulating USD market value on this chain

Protocol roster map

Dexs2 rows

The largest listed protocol's global TVL is 136683.0% of this chain's TVL, so treat the roster as context, not allocation.

This chain, measured

The Almanac's instruments, read for Zero Network alone. Open any one for the full method, history, and what it can and cannot mean.

Share of all DeFi

0.00%rank #327 of 461

Zero Network holds 0.00% of all on-chain liquidity, the #327 deepest chain. Dominance is how much of the ocean sits here.

30-day tide

Range: Zero Network TVLJun 13, 2026 to Aug 11, 2026
Observations: 60
First: $126,153
Latest: $1,480

-96.2%draining

Zero Network's reported USD TVL moved -96.2% over the last month. Token-price effects are not removed, so this is not labelled deposit flow.

Roster concentration

54%SakuraSwap AMM leads roster

SakuraSwap AMM is 54% of the listed non-CEX roster by global protocol TVL. This is context, not a per-chain allocation.

Largest protocols by reported TVL on Zero Network

Protocol	Category	TVL	7d
SakuraSwap AMM	Dexs	$2.02M	-3.1%
SakuraSwap CLMM	Dexs	$1.73M	+1.5%

How to read Zero Network liquidity

7-day and 30-day nominal TVL tide

The short tide is -96.3% across 7.3 observed days. The 30-day tide is -96.2% across 30.3 observed days. Read those as nominal USD movement in the depth proxy. Token-price effects are not removed.

Protocol concentration

Bathymark reads 2 large protocols and 1 categories on Zero Network. Concentration matters because one venue can make a chain look deeper than it is, even when the venue also operates elsewhere.

What it cannot mean

Rising TVL cannot prove new users arrived. Falling TVL cannot prove abandonment. The number describes depth, then the cause has to be checked.

Questions this page answers

What is Zero Network TVL in this snapshot?

Zero Network reports $1.5K in nominal DeFi TVL on Bathymark's current open-data reading. That is a USD-valued depth proxy, not measured exit liquidity.

Is Zero Network nominal TVL rising or falling?

Which protocols hold the most liquidity on Zero Network?

SakuraSwap AMM, SakuraSwap CLMM are among the deepest protocols Bathymark reads on Zero Network.

What does liquidity depth mean for Zero Network?

Measurement receipt

What this number is, and is not

Bathymark reads source-reported USD TVL as a chain-depth proxy. The value can move because assets repriced, deposits changed, withdrawals changed, incentives moved, or the source mapping changed.

Source: DeFiLlama chain, protocol, and stablecoin datasets
Snapshot: 2026-08-11T06:47:29.918Z
Freshness: Live validated snapshot
History: Current validated history captured 2026-08-11T06:47:52.007Z
Caveat: Nominal USD change, price effects are not removed

Read the method Inspect source policy

Connected to Zero Network

Every surface that reads this chain from another angle, so a question that starts here never dead-ends.