draining
Renzo's reported nominal TVL changed -2.4% over seven days, inside the steady band.
Liquid Restaking · REZ
Renzo's reported nominal TVL changed -2.4% over seven days, inside the steady band. Users paid $3.8K in fees over 24 hours, a +1.6% annualized paid-activity read against the reported TVL snapshot. Fees do not prove persistent demand or tokenholder value capture.
What this page answers
Renzo reports $89.37M in nominal USD TVL across 12 chains. Bathymark classifies it as Liquid Restaking,reads its seven-day nominal TVL tide as -2.4%, and joins that TVL context to fees, retained revenue, DEX volume, leverage, and token price where configured rows exist. Token-price effects are not removed from the TVL tide.
REZ daily price observations from the open, keyless DeFiLlama coins feed. The latest label is the last returned history point, not a separate live quote. Liquidity depth over time for a single protocol needs a self-hosted indexer (see the data moat), so this reads price alone, not a depth overlay. Information, not financial advice.
Nominal TVL is the starting depth proxy. The read gets sharper when the same slug also has user fees, retained revenue, trading turnover, or leverage pressure in open data.
Renzo's reported nominal TVL changed -2.4% over seven days, inside the steady band.
24h fees annualized against the visible TVL snapshot.
7d retained revenue as a share of 7d fees.
Token market capitalization divided by reported nominal protocol TVL. Neither input is executable liquidity.
Renzo ranks #260 by reported nominal TVL. Inside Liquid Restaking, it ranks #3 among the comparable rows Bathymark reads.
Renzo generated $50.2K in fees over 7 days. Fees are user payments, not token price direction.
Renzo retained $50.2K over 30 days, roughly +24.9% of 7-day fees.
The chains this protocol operates across.
Other Liquid Restaking rows in the same DeFiLlama category, shown so the absolute number has context.
The current reported TVL is $89.37M. Bathymark uses it as a depth proxy, not a measurement of exit liquidity or price-adjusted deposits.
$3.8K of fees were visible over 24 hours, and $50.2K over 7 days.
Renzo is listed across 12 chains in the current source snapshot.
A TVL move can be caused by deposits, withdrawals, incentives, or asset repricing. Fee, revenue, and volume rows help, but none of them make this financial advice.
Reported nominal TVL comes from the open DeFiLlama protocol list. Operating rows come from DeFiLlama fees, revenue, DEX, open-interest, and coins endpoints when the same slug is present. Bathymark deliberately avoids the heavy per-protocol history endpoint on this page so the long tail stays fast and cheap to serve.
Nominal USD TVL, category, chain coverage, and reported tide
24h and 7d user fees
24h, 7d, and 30d retained revenue
Token price history
Renzo reports $89.37M in nominal USD TVL in Bathymark's current open-data read. That is a depth proxy, not measured exit liquidity.
Renzo is draining over 7 days, with a nominal TVL tide of -2.4%. Token-price effects are not removed.
Renzo is listed across Ethereum, Linea, Solana, Arbitrum, Zircuit, Mode, and more.
Renzo is classified as Liquid Restaking in the open protocol list Bathymark reads.